Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
February 8, 2011
Image Size
69.7 KB
Resolution
600×750
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
6,976 (1 today)
Favourites
82 (who?)
Comments
113
Downloads
4,270
×
Gardevoir Aren't Furries by KiloTrays Gardevoir Aren't Furries by KiloTrays
A furry is an animal (fox, rabbit, dog, etc.) with human-like qualities. Gardevoir are designed to be HUMANS not animals. They're not even covered in fur. So what dumbass said she was a furry?
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmattyh2k1:
mattyh2k1 Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Kilo is right! Leave Gardy ALONE!
Reply
:iconlazener:
Lazener Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014
Well there are actually multiple definitions of furry. The one I normally go with is not the creature, but the person infatuated with it.
Reply
:icongargomon251:
Gargomon251 Featured By Owner May 2, 2014
So I guess E.T. and Tinkerbell are furries too.
Reply
:iconsombraluz-images:
Sombraluz-Images Featured By Owner Feb 13, 2014  Professional General Artist
Pokemon are animal-like beings in their world. So, not furry, but a humanoid animal-like creature. They are also in a pet like friendship with their trainers. So if a trainer (human) is in a romantic relationship with a Gardevoir, Jynx, Melotta, Mr. Mime, etc... They are having a wrong relationship with their "pet". Even if these pokemon look like humans remotely, the relationship in the series is pet to owner. This even is in Digimon with Angemon and Angewoman; they are Takeru and Hikari's non-human friends (pet like friendship).  On another note, anthropomorphism (anthro) applies even to animals without fur. People just use the the term furry as a blanket term.

Spend too much time on these subjects when writing stories and watching Thundercats....

Another joke ruined thanks to SCIENCE! :rofl:
Reply
:iconotaku4242:
otaku4242 Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
nope. shes so much better
Reply
:iconalpha-genesis:
Alpha-Genesis Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2013
She's a fairy type. Therefore not a furrie.
Reply
:iconlonly0soul:
lonly0soul Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2013
.......furries
Reply
:iconraynaldo:
Raynaldo Featured By Owner May 25, 2013  Student Artisan Crafter
Not sure if that's a fair argument. Where does that leave reptiles, birds, aquatic creatures, insects etc animals without fur?
Reply
:iconmemeist:
Memeist Featured By Owner May 20, 2013  Student Traditional Artist
i am pretty sure that she is a treant, according to my friend, embrace species means carnivorous plant
Reply
:iconkilotrays:
KiloTrays Featured By Owner May 23, 2013
No, Gardevoir is NOT a plant. Here, "embrace" means to hold close as an expression of affection, which is what Gardevoir does with her trainer. Gardevoir is more so a guardian angel.
Reply
Add a Comment: